Mass Media At The Crossroads Of Patriotism And Professionalism: The Complexities Of Telling Our Stories – Abdulwarees Solanke

Recently, I started a discourse on *Telling Sustainable Development Stories*. But the truth is ,most mass media in Africa are at the crossroads of playing the role of societal watchdog, functioning as fourth estate of the realm which demands independence, objective, balance and a correct appreciation of differences between public and national interest and government interest. It is in this appreciation that the mass media are able to also play the agenda setting role, which raises the question of what agenda the media must set.

Ideally, the agenda of the mass media be public interest-based agenda, agenda that must form the basis of government decisions, policies, and actions.

The agenda may, however, originally be at variance with thinking inside government, but it must contain alternatives and options, pathways, and possibilities.

Indeed, there comes a time in the life of any nation, desirous of change, progress, and development that difficult choices and decisions have to be made. This definitely   is the time for us not only in sub-Saharan Africa but in all other regions of the world grappling with development challenges.

But, that choice or decision is not for the government or the leadership of these countries alone to make. While the buck may stop at the desk of the leaders, whatever choice or decision they make will in the final analysis will still be subject to citizens’ approval or validation and support.

In countries of sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria, the challenge is not really just of economic dimension, even though it seems most manifest in the dismal macroeconomic indices of productivity, employment, savings, investment and consumption. It is a challenge in their entire policy making process.

This real challenge can be located within the structure of the polity of the various countries, which invariably determine the colour of their politics, dictates the nature of their governance, and affects the stability of their economy.   

This combination has so far been dictating how various stakeholders within and outside government support or  validate and implement reform projects and policies of their governments.

In Nigeria, for instance, this is a remarkable feature of the country’s post-colonial history since 1960 when she gained political independence from Britain till today that the country is battling a number of nation-building crises.These crises have collectively hampered the pace of Nigeria’s development despite her unquantifiable endowments and huge potential for leadership, not only in Africa but also in the entire world.

The issue is that many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa hardly outlived their politics of prebendalism as they stilgrapple with foundational crises of nation-building.

The dominant discussion of restructuring or dissolving the nation among some interest groups is a pointer the weakness of national cohesion, when themes like marginalization, corruption and other negative values that compromise national growth and sustainable development rule the airwaves and the press.

In this scenario, no matter how sincere or good is the intention of the country’s leadership or government in any reform initiative, such initiative will still be a victim of political dynamics.

This combination of the structure of the polity, the colour of politics and the fibre of governance therefore determines how the elites, the bureaucrats and the technocrats, the labour movement, the mass media and other interest groups aggregate on the policy issues African nations have to address iin their quest for sustainable development.

This being so in the process of decision making, the countries are usually constrained in the constituent of participants, the sincerity of advisers, the range and rationality of choices and alternatives  and the quality and acceptability of decision whenever any reform project is to be embarked upon.

The mass media that are supposed to be facilitators are also caught in this web in the kind of issues they frame or mainstream and the agenda they set.

In this context, we need to raise a dozen questions germane to achieve success and sustainable development in our reform projects.

These questions underline the nature, relevance, and depth of the sustainable development stories mass media should feature about countries of sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and the Pacific Rim.

Such stories should reflect the richness and diversity of our content and themes and how we tell such stories to inspire or facilitate the understanding of the issues.

How does media  tell the stories to give them authority, validity, and credibility and consequently engender the support of all relevant actors and stakeholders?

These essentially are the very essence or purpose of public service media working for the achievement of sustainable development in their respective countries.

In my next reflection, these are the concerns I will be  raising to share more insights and perspectives on what as media managers we should be focussed on in our daily programming, periodic publications and what the social media should always reflect in addressing poverty and how to lift our peoples out of backwardness, diseases and disconnectedness in a globalized world that is now neatly networked by technological explosion.

• Abdulwarees, a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Public Diplomacy and Management and 2007/ 2008 Commonwealth Broadcasting Association Scholar in Public Policy at the Universiti Brunei Darussalam is currently Head/ Deputy Director of Strategic Planning and Corporate Development Department Voice of Nigeria.

The post Mass Media At The Crossroads Of Patriotism And Professionalism: The Complexities Of Telling Our Stories – Abdulwarees Solanke appeared first on The Shield Online!.